Motorcross Crash POV

GoPro: Motocross Scrub Fail



from Liveleak.com Rss Feed - http://ift.tt/1fDoR1f

v

Motorcross Crash POV

By: jironde on: 7:35 AM

Russian Ex Pats: Don't Let Putin Grab Ukraine.

Don't Let Putin Grab Ukraine Feb 3rd, 2014 By vpawlowsky Category: News VIENNA - As Russian leaders, diplomats and commentators ponder the division of Ukraine, we must begin to ask what this would actually mean. If the present crisis ends with the fragmentation of the Ukrainian state, the result will be disastrous for all concerned, including Russia. The risk is that, in conditions of chaos and in the absence of a decisive Western stance, Russia could follow the logic of its current commitments to a very dangerous conclusion. Unlike Europe and the United States, Russia has a clear stance on Ukraine. Vladimir Putin's hope for the future is his Eurasian Union, to be established next January as a rival to the European Union. Belarusian and Kazakh strongmen are game to join his dictators' club. But since the idea has little popular support anywhere, Eurasian integration can take place only in conditions of Russian domination and local dictatorship. For Mr. Putin, the Eurasian Union would be meaningless without Ukraine. Eurasian ideology is the brainchild of Alexander Dugin, who has never disguised his admiration of fascism. His website publishes Russian strategists who claim that Ukraine is not a sovereign state. The current crisis in Ukraine began because of Russian foreign policy. The Ukrainian government, led by Viktor Yanukovych, seemed poised to sign a popular association agreement with the European Union. Mr. Putin jumped in quickly with cash and low gas prices for Mr. Yanukovych, who then abruptly changed course, refusing to sign it. Because Mr. Yanukovych's family has amassed unbelievable wealth during his presidency, he might also have been concerned about the possibility that the European Union would bring the rule of law. This would not be a risk in the Eurasian Union. Since late November, millions of Ukrainians have campaigned for a pro-European course, only to find themselves branded extremists, foreign agents and criminals. With the Russian money came the Russian model of rule. Yanukovych had the Parliament illegally "pass" legislation that made Ukraine a dictatorship on Jan. 16. The new laws were imitations of Russian ones. But Ukraine is not Russia. Too many Ukrainians have tasted too much freedom for too long. The people resisted this sudden attempt at tyranny. Mr. Yanukovych lost control over local institutions of power, and last week made gestures toward the opposition by accepting the resignation of an unpopular prime minister and reversing some dictatorial laws. But grotesque repression continues under a ministry of internal affairs with close ties to Russia, and the military's leadership is making noises about "stability." If Russia does intervene again, the next stage might be an internal coup, where pro-Russian Ukrainian politicians take power, perhaps retaining Mr. Yanukovych as a figurehead. The Ukrainian politicians responsible for the violence depend on Russian intervention for their political survival. If Russia supports an internal coup in Ukraine, resistance will only increase. For the time being, the Olympic Games at Sochi might constrain Russian policy, since Mr. Putin has little interest in looking like an imperialist aggressor while playing host to the world. Before and during the Games, it would be worthwhile watching for three signs of escalation: If Russian propaganda insists that the Ukrainian opposition are Nazis and anti-Semites (such manipulative exploitation of the memory of World War II is already underway); if terrorist attacks in Russia during the Olympic Games are blamed on Ukrainian nationalists; and, finally, if Russian forces ostensibly in southwestern Russia to secure the Games are assembled not to the east of Sochi but to the west - along the Ukrainian border. Russia could engineer a coup in Ukraine out of sheer nervousness and lack of better ideas, in the vague hope that the Eurasian dream can somehow be rescued for Mr. Putin. But if and when the Russian puppets fail, Mr. Putin would face a choice between armed intervention and loss of face. The use of Russian arms in Ukraine would probably lead to massive bloodshed, but not to a favorable outcome for Moscow. Even if Russia could win a quick war, which is unlikely, underground resistance would continue. The European Union and the present Ukrainian leadership must strike a deal - and quickly. The remaining dictatorship laws must be repealed and a full amnesty granted to opposition activists. International organizations such as Doctors Without Borders should be given a list of those arrested and allowed to visit the wounded. Parliamentary democracy should be restored on the model of the 2004 Ukrainian Constitution, and new presidential and parliamentary elections must be held. The way out of the crisis is a return to Ukrainian democracy. Mr. Yanukovych was elected, but has since illegally changed the system in ways that undermine its legitimacy. With a fresh start and new elections, Ukrainians could decide for themselves whether they prefer Europe or Eurasia. From its side, the European Union could renew talks over an association agreement, and offer some immediate loans. If democracy is restored in Ukraine, the Ukrainian economy would no doubt be hurt by the end of Russian loans and by Russian trade boycotts. But European countries can buy whatever products Russia boycotts and, in the long run, trade with Europe is more important than trade with Russia. This is a test for the European Union. The Ukrainian leaders who organize violence and keep close ties with Russia are already in Europe - with their diplomatic passports, bank accounts, front companies, residences and lobbyists. The real question is whether oligarchy or inclusion is the future of Europe. If the European Union does not act and there is a Russian-backed internal coup in Ukraine, the likely consequences are military disaster for Russia and political crisis in the European Union. If European diplomats can broker a solution, Russian diplomats and pundits will protest that Ukrainian democracy is nothing but Western meddling. But in their hearts, most Russians, if perhaps not quite all, will be relieved. Timothy Snyder is a professor of history at Yale and a fellow at the Institute for Human Sciences. He is the author of "Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin."



from Liveleak.com Rss Feed - http://ift.tt/1fDoQKR

v

Russian Ex Pats: Don't Let Putin Grab Ukraine.

By: jironde on: 7:35 AM

Compilation MARCH 2014 - Best of Fails - Wins

Compilation MARCH 2014 - Best of Fails - Wins



from Liveleak.com Rss Feed - http://ift.tt/1gNA0R0

v

Compilation MARCH 2014 - Best of Fails - Wins

By: jironde on: 6:08 AM

Obama's Multiple Regime Change Fronts

Obama's Multiple Regime Change Fronts by Stephen Lendman Previous articles discussed Obama's rogue agenda in detail. His destructive pattern continues unabated. Throughout his tenure, he did what supporters thought impossible. He exceeded the worst of George Bush. His policies replicate Republican hardliners. Neocons infest his administration. He's waging war on humanity. He's doing at home and abroad. He wrecked America's economy. He looted the nation's wealth. He handed Wall Street crooks multi-trillions of dollars. He gave trillions more to war profiteers. Other corporate favorites benefitted hugely. So did super-rich elites. Ordinary Americans struggle through protracted Depression level conditions. Hard times keep getting harder. They persist. They show no signs of ending. Growing millions face impoverishment without jobs or futures. Freedoms are disappearing in plain sight. Police state ruthlessness targets dissent. Abuse of power is institutionalized. Multiple regime change fronts target foreign leaders. Independent ones aren't tolerated. Obama wants Syria's Assad replaced. He's waging proxy to oust him. He's responsible for three years of bloody conflict. Mass slaughter, destruction and unspeakable human misery define it. Millions of internally and externally displaced Syrians attest to his ruthlessness. War rages without end. Peace talks are more pretense than real. Full-scale US intervention may follow their failure. They're currently deadlocked. They're going nowhere. Syrians want their sovereign rights protected. Obama wants unconditional surrender. He wants pro-Western puppet governance replacing Assad. He wants similar stooges in charge elsewhere. So-called Iranian nuclear talks may fail. Pursuing them is red herring cover for regime change. Iran's nuclear program is entirely peaceful. It has no military component. Washington hardliners claim otherwise. So does Obama. Saying so flies in the face of hard evidence. Annual US intelligence assessments affirm Iran's peaceful program. So do IAEA inspectors. Regime change matters more. So does eliminating an Israeli rival. Perhaps Obama plans more war to do it. Maybe he intends manipulating nuclear talks to fail as pretext. Maybe he'll attack Iran jointly with Israel. Maybe he'll risk regional war doing it. Imagine the unthinkable. Imagine humanity threatening nuclear war. Bush administration's 2001 Nuclear Policy Review asserted first strike nuclear policy strategy. His 2002 and 2006 National Security Strategies reaffirmed it. In 2010, Obama's Nuclear Posture Review was old wine in new bottles. Rhetoric changed, not policy. Obama "reserves the right" to use nuclear weapons preemptively. He does so based on real or invented threats. He does it against non-nuclear power states. His land/sea/air triad offensive can be activated on his call alone. He can order bombs away against any country. He can claim preemptive defense against a nonexistent existential threat. He can risk mushroom-shaped cloud denouement doing so. Total war risks what no responsible leader would dare. Obama waged multiple direct and proxy wars throughout his entire tenure. He's got other targets in mind. How many more millions will suffer on his watch? How many more will perish? How much more human suffering is too much? America's super-weapons include the Mother of All Bombs. It has globe-circling delivery systems. It has arsenal strength able to extinguish human life in hours. Days at most. It's perhaps lawless enough to try. Evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr (1904 - 2005) said human intelligence doesn't guarantee survival. Beetles and bacteria stand a better chance than humans. They may become the only species ever to self-destruct. Hubris produces bad endings. America faces the same fate as all previous empires. None survived. America's denouement may take humanity with it. Imagine having leaders willing to risk it. Imagine ending life on earth. Waging war on Syria risks regional war. Attacking Iran risks the unthinkable. Plans were readied years ago. Updating followed. Bombs away could happen with push button ease. Is Obama foolhardy enough to risk it? Ukraine is targeted for regime change. The battle for its soul continues. Same old, same old reflects US policy. Obama wants another independent leader toppled. He wants pro-Western stooge governance replacing him. He wants opposition leader Arseny Yatsenyuk leading it. On Sunday, he addressed supporters publicly. He did so in Ukraine's Independence Square. President Viktor Yanukovych extended an olive branch earlier. Yatsenyuk rejected his offer to become prime minister. He's forming his own government, he said. He wants Ukraine's 2004 constitution reinstated. It calls for combined parliamentary/presidential rule. Obama wants Ukraine colonized for profit. He wants its resources plundered. He wants ordinary Ukrainians turned into serfs. He wants Russia increasingly weakened and isolated. He's in league with ultranationalist extremists. He's involved in inciting continuing violent clashes. He wants all former Soviet republics transformed into subservient US satellites. He wants America's war machine encroaching on Russia's borders. Imagine challenging the only other nation able to match America's nuclear might blow for blow. Imagine the potential mother of all conflicts. Imagine the possible mother of all bad endings. Imagine an irresponsible US leader willing to risk the unthinkable. Imagine bipartisan complicity doing nothing to stop him. Imagine strong anti-war sentiment absent on streets protesting. Imagine America again getting away with mass murder. Imagine it on the most unspeakable of ugly scales. Imagine risking humanity's survival in the process. Imagine imperial madness exceeding everything preceding it. Imagine targeting Venezuela at the same time. Imagine wanting Bolivarian social justice destroyed. Imagine trying for the past 15 years to extinguish it. Imagine new schemes following failed ones. Imagine wanting control of Venezuela's vast oil reserves. They're the world's largest. Big Oil has its eye on the prize it covets. Obama killed Chavez. He was either poisoned or infected with cancer causing substances. Maduro believes he's targeted the same way. He knows Obama wants him ousted. He wants fascist governance replacing him. US manipulated violence continues on Venezuelan streets. On Sunday, President Nicolas Maduro addressed thousands of supporters. "You want to see people in the streets? We'll give you people in the streets," he said. Thousands cheered him. "I'm not going to give one millimeter of the power the Venezuelan people have given me." "Nothing will stop me from building this revolution which comandante Chavez left us." Maduro denounced protesters as coup d'etat fascists. Responsible parties will be prosecuted according to the full letter of the law, he said. He accused former Colombian president Alvaro Uribe of fomenting unrest. He called him an "enemy of Venezuela." So is anti-Bolivarian fascist politician Leopoldo Lopez. He heads Venezuela's hard-right Voluntad Popular (Popular Will) party. He incited violence. "There cannot be peace," he said. A warrant was issued for his arrest. He's charged with murder, terrorism, conspiracy, incitement to crime, setting fire to a public building, damaging public property, public intimidation, and inflicting serious injuries. Maduro called him "the face of fascism." He threatens Venezuelan freedom. He's against Bolivarian fairness. So are other likeminded extremists. On Sunday, Venezuelan Minister of Interior and Justice Miguel Rodriguez Torres spoke publicly. He condemned opposition-provoked street violence. "(V)andalism protests, he called them. Popular Will party extremists incite them. John Kerry issued an outrageous one-sided statement. In didn't surprise. In part, he said: "We are particularly alarmed by reports that the Venezuelan government has arrested or detained scores of anti-government protestors and issued an arrest warrant for opposition leader Leopoldo Lopez." "These actions have a chilling effect on citizens' rights to express their grievances peacefully." He ignored Washington's role in inciting violence. He condemned what he supports. Doublespeak duplicity defines US policy. Kerry called on Venezuela's government "to provide the political space necessary for meaningful dialogue with the Venezuelan people..." He urged restoration of calm. He called "(f)reedoms of expression and peaceful assembly...universal rights." Venezuela "has an obligation to protect" them," he said. Bolivarian principles champion them. America systematically trashes rule of law principles. It's waging economic, political and street clash war on Venezuela. Don't expect Kerry to explain. Obama has three years left in office. How many more independent governments does he plan to target? How much more street violence will he cause? How many more wars will he wage? How much more carnage will follow? How much longer will Americans tolerate his lawlessness? The only solution is nonviolent revolution. Resisting tyranny is a national imperative. America's Declaration of Independence endorsed it, saying: "(W)hever any form of government (threatens) life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness...it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government." Jefferson, Madison and other notable Americans supported doing so. Tyranny is too unjust to tolerate. Good people are obligated to resist. It's a noble tradition. It's a universal right for justice. It's high time Americans got some. The alternative is perhaps perish. Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. His new book is titled "Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity." http://ift.tt/TTNY9C Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com. Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening. http://ift.tt/PqLxX4 posted by Steve Lendman @ 11:45 PM



from Liveleak.com Rss Feed - http://ift.tt/1d65LjJ

v

Obama's Multiple Regime Change Fronts

By: jironde on: 5:08 AM

Explosion memories reflected in camera

On February 17, an art gallery located on a hill Gain tube leaks that occur in the kitchen after the explosion, the surrounding area is reflected in security cameras. Images shows a woman walking on the sidewalk as the first. Meanwhile, an explosion is coming. With the explosion shattering the windows of a workplace is spread on the pavement. Meanwhile, the woman's place of work in front of the road running from injury at the last moment of panic to escape. istanbul-Turkey



from Liveleak.com Rss Feed - http://ift.tt/1l2ehIq

v

Explosion memories reflected in camera

By: jironde on: 2:53 AM

Man gets chased by cows for doing a Bike stunt!

Holy Cow!! ROFL!



from Liveleak.com Rss Feed - http://ift.tt/1h11QsJ

v

Man gets chased by cows for doing a Bike stunt!

By: jironde on: 2:53 AM

Journalism Fail: All the Sources in Stealth Jet Story Are PAID to Praise the Plane

On Sunday, 60 Minutes ran a story about the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter entitled, "Is the F-35 Worth It?" But watching the piece, I saw no debate whatsoever of that very important question. And for good reason. All the interview subjects were government employees or contractors. They'd have been crazy to criticize their own program. What I did see on Sunday was an ill-informed reporter-David Martin-touring the military side of the $400-billion F-35 program ... and throwing in just a few boilerplate questions. These questions were softballs, considering how big of a blunder this program actually has been. The F-35 is meant to replace 2,400 existing warplanes in the Air Force, Marine Corps and Navy. Complex and badly compromised by the need to meet all the military branches' diverse needs, the JSF is overpriced, unreliable and sluggish . 60 Minutes mentioned that the F-35 is behind schedule and over budget, has some bad lighting and unsatisfactory tires ... and that's about it. Those gripes barely scratch the surface of the JSF boondoggle. http://ift.tt/1l23Nc0 the producer of this segment actually a vice president over at Lockheed Martin, which makes the ostensibly radar-evading plane? All kidding aside, it looked like reporter Martin was having a blast playing with million-dollar gadgetry and brushing shoulders with military brass and test pilots. But where was the long list of design and quality-control issues with the aircraft, 12 years after development began? What about discussing the many alternatives to this under-performing machine , such as F-22s and drones plus rebuilt F-15s, F-16s and F/A-18s? Why not point out how many experts in the defense journalism and analysis worlds see the JSF program as detracting from America's security rather than enhancing it? And how could 60 Minutes have not sought the opinion of someone- anyone- who is not receiving a paycheck from the F-35 program? The widely-seen spot included no third-party aerospace or defense experts and cited not a single independent study. Martin mainly asked the same questions a child would have asked. Program officials put the F-35's badly flawed special helmet on Martin's head in a dark hangar and let him look around at the projected infrared image. He was mesmerized-and quickly moved past the uncomfortable fact that the helmet doesn't actually work in combat conditions! Then came the worst part-the finale of the whole piece, the "hard-hitting" statement that none of the JSF's issues really matter because we are going to buy potentially thousands of the aircraft no matter how good or relevant they may be. Cool fighter pilot guys with beaming grins and dressed like Maverick from Top Gun , a no-nonsense Marine and a bureaucrat characterized as a staunch defender of your tax dollars-all of 60 Minutes ' on-camera sources said the F-35 is just great and everything will work out fine! No kidding. They're all military officers, contractors or government workers. Again, 60 Minutes did not include any outside sources-only people with a vested interest in praising the world's worst new jet fighter. 60 Minutes told the entire country that no matter what happens with ongoing testing, timelines, technological developments or costs, we will buy the F-35 in large numbers. So who really cares about this topic anymore anyway, right? We've published a new book all about the F-35. Sign up for a daily War is Boring email update here . Subscribe to WIB's RSS feed here and follow the main page here .



from Liveleak.com Rss Feed - http://ift.tt/NetvMi

v

Journalism Fail: All the Sources in Stealth Jet Story Are PAID to Praise the Plane

By: jironde on: 2:08 AM