While recently declared a "Knight of Quality Government", whistle-blower Rafi Rotem has been abused by the Israeli courts for over a decade. Now, he is criminally prosecuted in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court for "Insulting Public Servants". In a routine inspection of the whistle-blower Rotem criminal proseuction file in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court, an unusual set or records and decisions were discovered: Three copies of an August 17, 2014, 57-page document, previously forwarded to Israeli Supreme Court Presiding Justice Asher Grunis, documenting the Fraud upon the Court being perpetrated in the criminal prosecution in the Tel-Aviv court, with "Post-it Decisions" by Judges Predalsky and Hadassi-Herman of the Tel-Aviv court. Like all other decisions in this court file, these records were never duly served on the parties in this case, and they fail to appear from a public access terminal of the corut. Therefore, they should be deemed further evidence of the fraud in this criminal prosecution. Under Presiding Justice Asher Grunis, the Israeli courts have reached unprecedented corruption, part of widespread Organized State Crime in Israel. Whistle-blower Rafi Rotem, announced on September 22, 2014 "Knight of Quality Government", in one of the numerous retaliatory false arrests. Presiding Justice Asher Grunis - a layperson of a Grand Jury would find sufficient evidence for his indictment on collusion or misprision of perversion of justice and fraud upon the court. _____ OccupyTLV, September 24 - on September 22, 2014, media reported that Tax Authority whistle-blower Rafi Rotem was announced "Knight of Quality Government" by the Israeli Quality Government Movement. It is one of the numerous non-government organizations that sprung in recent years to fight widespread government corruption. Rotem was informed of his "Knighthood" on behalf of the organization in a personal phonecall by retired Israeli Supreme Court Justice Mishael Cheshin. A day earlier, on September 21, 2014, media reported that former Attorney General Menachem Mazuz was elected for a justice of the Supreme Court. In a 2013 interview Mazuz said that the Tax Aurthority corruption scandal was the closest to organized crime by high government officers. In the meanwhile, for over a decade the Israeli courts have been abusing Rafi Rotem - the Tax Authority whistle-blower. Judge Yael Pradelsky - the evidence shows her enaged in perversion of justice and fraud on the court in the ludicrous criminal prosecution of Rotem on "Insulting Public Servants"; Presiding Judge Zivah Hadassi-Herman filed a "Post-it Decision" in the court file with no lawful authority. ___ And now, Rotem is criminally prosecuted in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court on charges of "insulting public servants", Policemen and law enforcement officers, who falsely arrested him, abused him, beat him up, humiliated him, and denied him equal protection under the law filed complaints, which are the basis for the indictment in a criminal prosecution, which defies logic and the fundamentals of justice. Mounting evidence shows Perversion of Justice and Fraud upon the Court in this prosecution, including, but not limited to: * Appearance and replacement of outside attorneys as purported Public Defenders without filing their appointment records from the Public Defender's office, without filing any Certificate of Counsel by the Defendant, and with no lawful appointment by the Court; * Conduct of a prosecution, where court decisions are not served at all... * Appearance of an unauthorized outside attorney from a non-existent law-firm as Public Defender, who purportedly provided consent fo conduct, which includes admitting of evidence with no witnesses in a criminal prosecution; * Failure of the Public Defenders to file any motion with the Court in over a year and a half since the filing of the indictment;* Failure of the Public Defenders to receive the evidence from the Prosecution a year and a half after the filing of the indictment; * Inserting by the Office of the Clerk of hyperlinks to Police Investigation files in the electronic court file, prior to the filing of the evidnec in the court. * Inexplicable conduct of the Pro Tem Tel-Aviv District Public Defender and the National Public Defender, who attempt to cover-up the unlawful conduct of the outside-attorneys, who unlawfully appeared as Public Defenders in this case. On August 17, 2014, after initial inspection of the court file records in this case, Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), filed with Presiding Justice of the Supreme Court Asher Grunis notice of evidence of perversion of justice and fraud upon the court. The short letter was accompanied by a copy of the entire court file from the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court. Dr Zernik's letter to Presiding Justice Grunis concludes:Combined, the aborted tax investigations, the refusal to investigate the allegations of corruption in the Tax Authority, and the persecution of Mr Rotem for over a decade, all appear to serve the interests of the same parties. Under such circumstances, it is not surprising that Rafi Rotem is often perceived as the poster-child of government corruption in the State of Israel in general, and the central role of the justice system in such corruption in particular. ... A 2013 media interview with former Israeli Attorney General Menachem Mazuz describes the Tax Authority scandal as the closest to organized crime in government. And already a 2009 report by the US Ambassador to Israel James Cunningham describes the effective merger of organized crime and government agencies in Israel. However, both did not consider the courts part of such phenomenon. In contrast, there is good reason for concern that the case in reference would be deemed direct evidence for the central role of the courts and the justice and law enforcement systems in Israel in the evolution of what is referred to in criminology as "state organized crime". Evidence that was discovered after sending the letter to Presiding Justice Grunis also implicated Pro Tem Tel-Aviv District Public Defender Elkana Leist and National Public Defener Yoav Sapir in collusion and/or misprision of felonies in this matter. August 24, 2014 first "Post-it Decision" by Judge Yael Pradelsky, Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court, stating: "I have read." The "Post-it Decision" is superimposed on a copy of the 57-page document, fowarded to Presiding Justice Grunis by Joseph Zernik, PhD, documenting the fraud being perpetrated by Pradelsky and others in the criminal prosecution against Rotem. August 24, 2014, second "Post-it Decision" by Judge Yael Pradelsky, Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court, stating: "The document was scanned into the court file. The Office of the Clerk shall forward it to the Honorable Presiding Justice of the Supreme Court and the Honorable Presiding Judge of the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court." The "Post-it Decision" is superimposed on yest another copy of the 57-page document, fowarded to Presiding Justice Grunis by Joseph Zernik, PhD, Human Rights Alert (NGO), documenting the fraud being perpetrated by Pradelsky and others in the criminal prosecution against Rotem. August 31, 2014 "Post-it Decision" by Presiding Judge Zivah Hadassi-Herman, Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court, in response on Judge Yael Pradelsky two August 24 "Post-it Decisions", stating: "The writer received a response from the Bureau of the Honorable Prisding Justice." It remains unclear, who filed the August 17, 2014 letter to Presiding Justice Grunis in this court file in the first place, since "Net HaMishpat", the IT system of the Israeli courts includes no comprehensive docket. The "Post-it Decisions", which are unsigned, and which the public is routinely denied access to are a prime example of the fraud inherent in the IT system of the Israeli courts. ___ In repeat inspection of the court file on September 23, 2014, a set of unuaul records was discovered: * Multiple copies of the August 17, 2014 letter by Joseph Zernik, PhD to Presiding Justice Asher Grunis of the Israeli Supreme Court. * "Post-it Decisions" by Presiding Judge Zivah Hadassi-Herman and Judge Yael Pradelsky of the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court, pertaining to Dr Zernik's letter. a. b. September 23, 2014, List of Decisions in State of Israel v Rafi Rotem (1074-02-13): a. As it appeared from a public access terminal of Net HaMishpat (IT system of the court). No decisions are listed in this criminal prosecution, which commenced in Feberuary 2013. The screen says: "No details found". b. As it appears from the Clerk of the Court access terminal of Net HaMishpat. The Israeli courts created a double book system, where they routinely hide decisions from public access, although the law permits public access to court decisions that are not lawfully sealed. ____ None of these records appears in the public access system of the Tel Aviv Magistrate Court in this case. The filing of Dr Zernik's letter to Presiding Justice Grunis in the court of file of State of Israel v Rafi Rotem, combined with the "Post-it Decisions" by the local judges, all of which were never duly served, should be deemed addtional evidence of perversion of justice in this case. In the 2013 submission of Human Rights Alert (NGO) to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, the "Post-it Decision" instrument, in itself, unsigned, and hidden from public access, was provided as a prime example of the fraud inherent in the new IT systems of the Israeli courts. The 2013 Human Rights Alert submission was incorporated into the Human Rights Council Periodic Report on Israel with the note: "lack of integrity in the electronic record systems of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees' courts in Israel." The August 28, 2014 response by Presiding Justice Asher Grunis on the August 17, 2014 Dr Zernik's letter, providing evidence of perversion of justice and fraud upon the court in State of Israel v Rotem in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court. ____ The Auguest 28, 2014 response by Presiding Justice Asher Grunis to Joseph Zernik, PhD, on his August 17, 2014 letter says: ...your August 17, 2014 letter was received in the bureau of the Hon Presiding Justice Asher Grunis and brought for his inspection. Your letter pertains to a case that is under review in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court. You are not a party to the case. The Presiding Justice sees no reason to address a case that is under review. It should be noted that the Israeli Rules of Judicial Ethics (2007) authored by former Presiding Justice Dorit Beinisch, fail to refer in any way to the duties of a judge, when informed of corruption in the courts. In contrast, the Code of Conduct of US Judges, Canon 3(B), says: (4) A judge with supervisory authority over other judges should take reasonable measures to ensure that they perform their duties timely and effectively. (5) A judge should take appropriate action upon learning of reliable evidence indicating the likelihood that a judge's conduct contravened this Code or a lawyer violated applicable rules of professional conduct. And the California Code of Judicial Ethics, Canon 3, D, says:D. Disciplinary Responsibilities (1) Whenever a judge has reliable information that another judge has violated any provision of the Code of Judicial Ethics, the judge shall take appropriate corrective action, which may include reporting the violation to the appropriate authority. (2) Whenever a judge has personal knowledge,* or concludes in a judicial decision, that a lawyer has committed misconduct or has violated any provision of the Rules of Professional Conduct, the judge shall take appropriate corrective action, which may include reporting the violation to the appropriate authority. In the 66 year history of the State of Israel, no judge was ever indicted on judicial corruption, regardless of plenty of evidence of widespread judicial corruption. Moreover, since the implementation of the new IT systems in the courts, judges have been repeatedly caught falsifying or even fabricating entire court records. However, such judges were provided full patronage by both Presiding Justice and the Minister of Justice. In contrast, there is no doubt that a layperson of a Grand Jury would find sufficient evidence inState of Israel v Rotem for indictment of: * Presiding Justice of the Supreme Court Asher Grunis * Presiding Judge of the Tel Aviv Magistrate Court Zivah Hadassi-Herman * Judge Yael Pradelsky * National Public Defender Yoav Sapir * Pro Tem Tel-Aviv Public Defender Elkana Leist * Attorneys Neil Simon, Itizk Sadeh, Yossi Saka, who appeared as outside Public Defenders * Persons in charge of the Tel-Aviv Police Prosection. The likely charges in such indictment would be: Collusion and/or Misprision of Felonies, pertaining to Perversion of Justice and Fraud Upon the Court. Halachic (Jewish) law is one of the sources of Israeli law, and Judge Yael Pradelsky keeps the appearance of an observant Jew. Therefore, it should also be noted that Perversion of Justice and Fraud Upon the Court should be deemed as violation of at least two of the Ten Caommandments: * Thou shalt not steal - fraud and public deception are considered in Halachic law main categories of theft; * Thou shalt not bear false witness ___
from Liveleak.com Rss Feed - Search results for 'fail' http://ift.tt/1vkiIAq
v
from Liveleak.com Rss Feed - Search results for 'fail' http://ift.tt/1vkiIAq
v
2014-09-24 Whistle-blower Rafi Rotem, Presiding Justice Asher Grunis, and organized crime in the Israeli courts
Views:
0 comments:
Post a Comment