Israel: Warrantless arrest of former PM Olmert - finally announcing the regime change... In the context of correspondence, which Attorney Feldman proposed to publish in the site named "The Hottest Place in Hell", the current letter deals with perversion of court records by the Court in former PM Ehud Olmert's perversion of court process trial, with Presiding Judge Avital Chen of the Jerusalem Magistrate Court, and Net-HaMishpat - IT system of the Court. Attorney Feldman, a legendary criminal defense attorney, and one who knows Israeli judges well, is asked to provide his opinion and propose explanations for the circumstances, including explanations involving ghosts and gremlins, as he did in the past... Arrests with no judgment records and no arrest warrants are typical of dictatorial regimes. If former PM Olmert is arrested on February 14, 2016, based on a trial with no judgment records and no arrest warrant, one should take it to be a declaration of regime change, which so far was undeclared... View in blog with all pics: http://ift.tt/1o85QA5 Figures: According to media reports, Presiding Judge Avital Chen of the Jerusalem Magistrate Court sentenced yesterday former PM Ehud Olmert to prison; former PM Ehud Olmert in court yesterday; Net-HaMishpat - IT system of the Court fails to show the protocols, decisions and judgments of the Court, or Ehud Olmert's arrest warrant, to be executed in a three days - February 14, 2016... _____ Dear Attorney Feldman: As I've previously written, it is a great honor that you find interest in my writing. Likewise, it is an honor that Prof Uzzi Ornan, Attorney Dan Yakir, and Prof Asa Kasher find interest in them. In the context of your proposal, that our correspondence by published in an alternative news site, "The Hottest Place in Hell", I add this discussion , regarding the fraud in development and operation of Net-HaMishpat... I would be happy to read your response and any explanation that you may propose for the circumstances described here, including explanations inolving ghosts and gremlins, as you proposed before... Judgments and Arrest Warrants in general The most important aspect of this saga from the Human Rights perspective, is the misconduct of the Israeli courts in criminal trials, failure to duly enter judgments regarding arrests, and failure to duly issue arrest warrants... As mentioned in a previous letter, in 2004 Justice Minister Tommy Lapid promulgated new Regulations of the Courts - Office of the Clerk, and voided the British mandate period regulations. With it, he abolished the duties and obligations of the Chief Clerk for "excellent maintenance of court files and registrations", for expedient, accurate and honest registration of judgments of the court, where he or she officiate. (in many courts it is customary that judgments must be entered on the same day that they were entered by the Judge). In international standards, a court where there is no honest and reliable entry of judgments at al, would no doubt be deemed incompetent and/or corrupt... medieval in nature... Furthermore, according to Israeli law (The Prisons Act, 1971), a prison director is prohibited from entering a person into prison, absent "lawfully made arrest warrant" (e.g., lawfully signed): 2. No person shall be admitted to prison unless pursuant to an arrest warrant or a detention warrant, brought with him. 3. The Prison Director shall verify that the warrant is signed by the correct authority and lawfully made, and that the prisoner is the person indicated in it. Similar laws are found in any civil society. This is a fundamental matter since the medieval period - already the Magna Carta (1215) addressed this matter as fundamental to the safeguard of human liberty. Such principles became the "cornerstone of the US Constitution" (according to Justice William Brennan Jr) - that the authorities must not deprive a person of liberty with no trial and duly made arrest warrant. Likewise, warrantless arrest is deemed serious violation of Civil and Human Rights. Such conduct is typical of dictatorships. However, since the implementation of Net-HaMishpat, I have difficulty finding lawfully made arrest warrants, or any arrest warrants at al... According to Israel law, in court files that are now lawfully sealed, arrest warrants are public records, which "any person" may inspect. Such law is essential in order to enable the public to safeguard human liberty, and prevent arbitrary and capricious arrests by the authorities. However, in the cases of Ehud Olmert and Shula Zaken in the "Holyland" affair in the Tel-Aviv District Court (Judge David Rosen) and the case of Roman Zadorov in the Nazareth District Court (Judges Yitzhak Cohen, Esther Hellman, Haim Galpaz) - both case are not sealed, and in both cases the reading of verdict and sentencing was widely covered by media - there are no lawfully entered judgment record in the "Judgment Docket" and there are no arrest warrants in the "Decisions Docket". Moreover, in both cases, the courts continue to deny public access to inspect the records, regardless of my repeat requests over many months. In the Roman Zadorov case, Presiding Judge Avraham Avraham has recently issued a "Post-it Decision" (sham/fabricated court record) threatening me with sanctions if I continue to file requests to inspect the court file. Following review of the existing evidence, relative to court file record in these cases (including the corresponding appeal files in the Supreme Court), and conduct of the courts relative to the requests to inspect the court files, any reasonable person would conclude that in both cases there are no lawfully made judgment records, and no arrest warrants either. Therefore, Shula Zaken was falsely imprisoned, and Roman Zadorov is falsely imprisoned. Moreover, the Prison Service has refused to lawfully answer on Freedom of Information requests, pertaining to current arrest warrant forms, and technological abilities of prison directors to verify that arrest warrants and judgment records are lawfully made in Net-HaMishpat, where electronic signatures are employed. You should recall that in Net-HaMishpat the judges implemented invisible electronic signatures ("The Emperor's New Clothes"), and fraud by issuing a fabricated/ simulated judicial record was central to the conduct of Judge Varda AlSheikh in the "reconstructed Protocol" affair. The reason is that parties, counsel , and even the Israel Bar Association were unable to distinguish in that affair that the "Reconstructed Protocol" was an invalid judicial record that was never lawfully signed and was an invalid judicial record, only a "draft". Decision of the Ombudsman of the Judiciary in this widely reported affair dwells on the details of the case. Another common fraud method today, involved the failure to enter decisions and judgments in the electronic court file in Net-HaMishpat, and the publication of such records in "Nevo Publishing, LTD", or in the website of the Spokeswoman of the Administration of Courts. In contrast, late Supreme Court Presiding Justice Joel Susman, in his opus "Court Procedures" clearly explains that the authentic court recod must be kept in the court file, and only based on it, certified "True Copy of the Original" copies can be generated... Such matter is also obvious to anybody who deals with administration of courts or the management of any valid, honest database... Judge Avital Chen and Defendant Ehud Olmert in the "Perversion" affair trial - State of Israel v Ehud Olmert (38168-01-16) According to media reports, Olmert is going to be imprisoned in a few days - on February 14, 2016. However, initial inspection of the court file in the Jerusalem Magistrate Court shows that the public records in Net-HaMishpat fail to match media reports (copied below), pertaining to actions of the Court and Judge Avital Chen: Figure 1: The February 10, 2016 hearing, which was widely reported by media was entered in the Court Calendar: "Reading of Sentencing" by Presiding Judge Avital Chen. ____ Figure 2: Two hearings are entered under the Case Calendar - on February 2, 2016 (Arraignment) and on February 10, 2016 (Reading of Sentencing), and for both the existence of protocols is indicated. ____ Figure 3: The "Decisions Docket" lists only one decision by Judge Avital Chen, dated January 19, 2016. The Decision says: "I schedule arraignment and presentation of the plea bargain deal for February 2, 2016, at 12:00 noon. The Office of the Clerk shall summon the parties." The two protocols, listed in the Case Calendar fail to be entered in the "Decisions Docket". ____ Figure 4: The "Judgment Docket" says: "No details were found". ____ Today, I plan on filing a "Pro Forma" Request to Inspect in State of Israel v Ehud Olmert (38168-01-16) in the Jerusalem Magistrate Court, similar to requests that I have recently filed in other cases. In such requests I ask that the Court correct the missing entries, purportedly human errors, pertaining to the registration of duly made protocols, verdict, sentencing, and arrest warrant under the publicly accessible "Decisions Docket" and the "Judgment Docket" in Net-HaMishpat. As one who knows well the hearts of Israeli judges, I wonder what you expect Judge Avital Chen's response would be. In my opinion, if former PM Ehud Olmert is imprisoned, while Judge Avital Chen and the the Jerusalem Magistrate Court continue to deny public access to judgments and arrest warrant, the matter should be deemed internationally newsworthy, given Olmert's station in life as former prime minister... One should consider it some kind of declaration of regime change in Israel, which so far was unannounced... I would be glad to read your response! Truly, Joseph Zernik OccupyTLV Human Rights Alert - NGO LINKS: 2016-02-10 Court Rejects Former Prime Minister Olmert's Plea Deal, Adding Month to Sentence Olmert will begin jail time mid-February, but Israel's top court must still rule on final case and decide if former prime minister will be jailed for 19 or 27 months. The Jerusalem District's Court rejected Wednesday a plea bargain agreement... http://ift.tt/20UTuJq 2016-02-02 Ex-PM Olmert Admits to Obstruction of Justice as Part of Plea Bargain Jerusalem judge partially accepts plea bargain, expresses doubt over the sides' request to let Olmert serve prison sentences concurrently. The Jerusalem Magistrate's Court on Tuesday partially accepted the plea... http://ift.tt/1o1MtID 2016-01-18 Ex-Israeli PM Olmert Signs Plea Deal With State for Time Served Under deal, former prime minister to confess to two counts of obstruction of justice, and stipulates he will serve forthcoming sentence concurrently with 18 months already dealt in Holyland case. Former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert signed a plea bargain with the... http://ift.tt/1WntzYa 2016-01-12 Lawyers Ask State Prosecutor to Okay Plea Deal for ex-PM Olmert Two weeks before Supreme Court hearing on appeal in the 'cash envelopes' case, lawyers have not received response to request for concurrent prison sentences and other dispensation in return for stopping legal proceedings on Olmert's behalf. Eyal Rozvovsky, a lawyer for former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, has approached State Prosecutor Shai Nitzan in an effort to arrange... http://ift.tt/1OYObGJ

from Liveleak.com Rss Feed - Search results for 'fail' http://ift.tt/20ru6sE
v

Israel: Warrantless arrest of former PM Olmert - finally announcing the regime change...

Uploaded by: jironde

Views:

Category: Liveleak.com Rss Feed - Search results for 'fail'

Share

Tweet